登入以檢視影片內容

逐字稿

首先,我認為30年前,我剛畢業於大學時,
我聽說美國有一個奇妙的策略,
他們將製造業的製造商輸送到美國,
他們將製造業的製造商輸送到墨西哥和中國,
他們將製造業的製造商輸送到印度。
有一本書叫做《世界是平的》。
Tom Friedman,紐約時報的同事。
我認為這是一個完美的策略。
你知道美國人說,我們只想控制IP,
我們只想要技術,我們只想要品牌,
我們只想要產業,我們只想要技術,
我們只想要品牌,我們只想要技術,
我們只想要技術,我們只想要品牌,
我們只想要技術,我們只想要技術,
我們只想要技術,我們只想要技術,
we just want to make more money.
So the market cap grew more than 100 times in the past 30 years.
But where did the money go?
This is what I'm curious about, because as a business person,
I always care about the balance sheet, where is the money coming from,
where did the money go?
In the past 30 years, the Americans had 13 wars,
spending $14.2 trillion.
The money went there.
The money was spent on building the infrastructure,
helping the white collars and blue collars.
No matter how strategy good it is,
you're supposed to spend money on your own people.
Not everybody can pass Harvard.
Like me, I'm not good at education.
We should spend money on those people who are not good at schooling.
And the other money, which I'm curious about,
is that when I was young,
I heard America is about Ford and Boeing,
those big manufacturing companies.
The last 10, 20 years, I heard about Silicon Valley and Wall Street.
The money goes to Wall Street.
And what happened?
Year 2008, the financial crisis
wiped out $19.2 trillion USA alone.
They wiped out all the white collars
and destroyed 34 million jobs globally.
So what if the money,
not Wall Street, what if the money
spent on the Middle East, Middle West of the United States,
developing the industry there,
that could be changed a lot.
So it's not the other countries steal jobs from you guys.
It is your strategy.
You do not distribute the money
and things in a proper way.
近 31 日
0 次瀏覽
本訊息有 0 則查核回應
目前沒有已撰寫的回應,建議對其抱持健康的懷疑。
AI 自動分析
以下是 AI 初步分析此訊息的結果,希望能在有人查核之前,先帶給您一些想法。
這則訊息中有幾個地方值得閱聽人特別留意或懷疑: 1. 作者提到美國在過去30年間進行了13場戰爭,花費了14.2兆美元。閱聽人需要注意這個數字是否屬實,以及作者對於這些戰爭的看法是否客觀。 2. 作者提到2008年的金融危機導致美國單獨損失了19.2兆美元,並摧毀了3400萬個全球工作機會。閱聽人需要對這些數字和事件背後的複雜原因有所懷疑,並思考作者的立場是否客觀。 3. 作者提到美國的資金主要流向了華爾街,而非中西部地區的產業發展。閱聽人需要思考這種資金分配是否合理,以及作者對於這種現象的評論是否客觀和全面。 總的來說,閱聽人應該保持批判性思考,對於訊息中的數據和觀點進行檢驗,並從多角度思考其中的複雜性和可能的偏見。
加 LINE 查謠言
加 LINE 查謠言
LINE 機器人
查謠言詐騙