登入以檢視影片內容

逐字稿

First, I think 30 years ago, when I just graduated from universities, I heard America had a wonderful strategy.
They outsource the manufacturer job, service jobs. They outsource the manufacturer to Mexico and China.
Outsource the service job to India. There's a book called The World is a Flat.
Tom Friedman, colleague at the New York Times.
And I think it's a perfect strategy.
You know, the Americans said, we just want to control the IP. We just want to have technology.
We just want the brand to leave the lower end jobs for the world.
Great strategy.
And second is that the American international companies made millions and millions of dollars from globalization.
The top 100 companies in America. Amazing.
I remember when I graduated from university, I tried to buy a beeper, the Motorola beeper. Cost me $250.
My pay at that time was $10 a month as a teacher.
And the cost of making that beeper is only $8 for a chip.
So, the past 30 years, IBM, Cisco, Microsoft, they made tons of money.
The money, the profit they made are much more than the four largest banks in China put together.
China, Mobile phone, China, Unicom, whatever you name it, put together.
Still, these multinational companies made more money than.
So, their market cap grew more than 100 times in the past 30 years.
But where did the money go?
This is what I'm curious because as a business people, I always care about the balance of shit.
Where the money coming, where the money go.
Past 30 years, the Americans had 13 wars, spending $14.2 trillion.
The money going there, what if they spent part of that money on building of the infrastructure?
Helping the white colors, the white colors and the blue colors.
No matter how strategy good it is, you're supposed to spend money on your own people.
Not everybody can pass Harvard.
Like me, I'm very not good at education.
We should spend money on those people who are not good at schooling.
And the other money which I'm curious about is that when I was young,
When I was young, I heard America is about the Ford, Ford and Boeing, those big manufacturing companies.
The last 10, 20 years, I heard about is Silicon Valley and Wall Street.
The money go to the Wall Street.
And what happened?
Year 2008, the financial crisis wiped out $19.2 trillion U.S.A. alone.
They wiped out all the white colors and destroyed 34 million jobs globally.
So what if the money, it's not Wall Street, what if the money spent on the Middle East, Middle West of the United States.
Developing the industry there, that could be changed a lot.
So it's not the other countries steal jobs from you guys.
It is your strategy.
But you do not distribute the money and things in a proper way.
This is what I...
近 31 日
0 次瀏覽
本訊息有 0 則查核回應
目前沒有已撰寫的回應,建議對其抱持健康的懷疑。
AI 自動分析
以下是 AI 初步分析此訊息的結果,希望能在有人查核之前,先帶給您一些想法。
這則訊息中有一些地方值得閱聽人特別留意或懷疑: 1. 關於美國外包製造和服務工作的策略:訊息中提到美國將製造工作外包到墨西哥和中國,服務工作外包到印度,並稱這是一個完美的策略。閱聽人需要謹慎對待這樣的一般性陳述,因為外包對於不同國家和人群可能有不同的影響,並非所有人都受益。 2. 關於美國國際公司從全球化中獲利豐厚:訊息中提到美國前100大公司從全球化中賺取了數百萬美元,並且指出它們的市值在過去30年增長了100倍以上。閱聽人需要注意到這樣的獲利是否對所有人都帶來了好處,以及這樣的獲利如何分配。 3. 關於美國在過去30年間的戰爭支出和基礎建設投資:訊息中提到美國在過去30年間進行了13場戰爭,花費了14.2兆美元,並質疑這些支出是否應該用於基礎建設和幫助人民。閱聽人需要思考這樣的支出是否符合公眾利益,以及政府應如何適當分配資金。 總的來說,閱聽人應該保持批判性思考,不僅僅接受訊息中的陳述,而是思考其中的脈絡和可能存在的偏見或省略。
加 LINE 查謠言
加 LINE 查謠言
LINE 機器人
查謠言詐騙