登入以檢視影片內容

逐字稿

First, I think 30 years ago, when I just graduated from universities, I heard America had a wonderful strategy.
They outsource the manufacture job, service jobs. They outsource the manufacture to Mexico and China.
Outsource the service job to India. There's a book called The World is a Flat.
Tom Friedman, the delegate at the New York Times.
And I think it's a perfect strategy.
You know, the Americans said, we just want to control the IP, we just want to technology, we just want to brand, to leave the lower end jobs for the world.
Great strategy.
And second is that the American international companies made millions and millions of dollars from globalization.
The top 100 companies in America. Amazing.
I remember when I graduated from university, I tried to buy a beeper, the Motorola beeper. Cost me $250.
My pay at that time was $10 a month as a teacher.
And the cost of making that beeper is only $8 for a chip.
So, the past 30 years, IBM, Cisco, Microsoft, they made tons of money.
The money, the profit they made are much more than the four largest banks in China put together.
The China Mobile phone, China Unicom and whatever you name it, put together.
Still, these multinational companies made more money than.
So, their market cap grew more than 100 times in the past 30 years.
But where did the money go?
This is what I'm curious because as a business people, I always care about the balance sheet.
Where the money coming, where the money go.
Past 30 years, the Americans had 13 wars, spending $14.2 trillion.
The money going there, what if they spent part of that money on building of the infrastructure?
Helping the white colors, the white colors and the blue colors.
No matter how strategy good it is, you're supposed to spend money on your own people.
Not everybody can pass Harvard.
Like me, I'm not good at education.
We should spend money on those people who are not good at schooling.
And the other money which I'm curious about is that when I was young,
When I was young, I heard that America is bad at food, and Boeing, those big manufacturing companies.
Last 10-20 years, I heard about Silicon Valley and Wall Street.
The money go to the Wall Street.
And what happened?
Year 2008, the financial crisis wiped out $19.2 trillion U.S.A alone.
They wiped out all the white colors and destroyed 34 million jobs globally.
So what if the money, it's not Wall Street.
What if the money spent on the Middle East, Middle West of the United States.
Developing the industry there, that could be changed a lot.
So it's not the other countries steal jobs from you guys.
It is your strategy.
But you do not distribute the money and things in a proper way.
This is what I...
近 31 日
0 次瀏覽
本訊息有 0 則查核回應
目前沒有已撰寫的回應,建議對其抱持健康的懷疑。
AI 自動分析
以下是 AI 初步分析此訊息的結果,希望能在有人查核之前,先帶給您一些想法。
這則訊息中有一些需要特別留意或懷疑的地方: 1. 關於美國外包製造和服務工作的策略:訊息中提到美國將製造工作外包到墨西哥和中國,服務工作外包到印度,並稱這是一個完美的策略。閱聽人需要謹慎對待這種一廂情願的看法,因為外包對於不同國家和人群可能產生不同的影響,並非所有人都能從全球化中受益。 2. 關於美國國際公司從全球化中獲利的描述:訊息中提到美國的跨國公司從全球化中賺取了數百萬美元,並將這些利潤與中國的四大銀行相比較。閱聽人需要注意到這種簡化的比較方式可能忽略了不同國家和產業之間的複雜性,以及全球經濟體系的互動影響。 3. 關於美國在過去30年間的戰爭支出和基礎建設投資的描述:訊息中提到美國在過去30年間進行了13場戰爭,花費了14.2兆美元,並質疑這些支出是否應該用於基礎建設和幫助本國人民。閱聽人需要謹慎對待這種對於國家支出和投資的批評,因為這涉及到政治、經濟和社會議題,觀點可能受到個人立場和價值觀的影響。 總的來說,閱聽人應該保持批判性思維,對於訊息中的觀點和描述進行分析和思考,並從多個角度來理解和評估其中所涉及的議題。
加 LINE 查謠言
加 LINE 查謠言
LINE 機器人
查謠言詐騙