登入以檢視影片內容

逐字稿

One of the leaders was there sitting in the jungle with his troops.
They heard the Indonesians in their home villages killing their women and children.
And they heard them screaming.
The Indonesians went in on purpose, intentionally, to attack the women and children so the men had come out.
They had to stay where they were.
Had they gone back, they'd have been wiped out.
And how's that for a tough choice?
This is the brutal mathematics of war, ladies and gentlemen.
This has been a war from the start.
Now, the White Hats had to watch all of these depraved acts continue.
Because they had to control security.
But having said that, having said that, they had to give the people something, some hope.
Does that make sense?
Because what would have happened to the people if they had no hope?
Just given up.
Most people would have just given up.
So what did they do?
They had to leak information that they couldn't afford to leak out.
But do it in such a way that the adversaries would laugh.
It was a laughing stock.
They would laugh at anybody.
It was so nonsensical.
It was so ridiculous.
Meaningless things.
You're loons.
And yet there was enough for a handful of people to get a hold of it and think, hang on a second.
Hang on a second.
And then one by one by one, the truth started coming out.
It's just enough to keep people frustratingly hooked.
And then they said it's going to happen on this date, but it never happened.
It's going to happen on this date, and it never happened.
But then somebody in New Zealand figured out they weren't based.
There were paragraph numbers from a document called the Law of War.
And people went back and went, oh, now I get it.
But bit by bit by bit, they fed us breadcrumbs.
And anybody that picked up that breadcrumb was ridiculed and lampooned.
So they gave us enough, but they had to do it in such a way that nobody would believe it was true.
Including the blackheads.
And so we, the core, kept the faith.
And bit by bit by bit, we grew.
OPSEC, operational security, was their center of gravity.
They were giving nothing out, regardless of what the blackheads did to the people.
And so again, this is war.
This is brutal.
It's not everyone's built for this.
But they did give us a few crumbs in the form of a Q.
Please, you must understand, in your world, in time, the war was fought the best way it could and the only way we could have won.
And if people get angry and they challenge you and say, ah, but these people died, you say, don't blame the White Hats.
Why are you blaming the White Hats?
Who did the killing?
The black hats.
And by the way, who allowed the situation to arise where the black hats were in that position of power?
Everybody put your hand up, because I'm responsible.
We all.
We all.
All of us, except maybe a couple that woke up about 40 years ago, have been screaming at the mirror, screaming at the mirror for 40, 50 years saying, wake up, you dumb bastards.
But the rest of us, we believe what we believe.
So we are responsible.
When someone challenges you and says, why didn't the White Hats save my daughter?
Be patient.
Be kind.
And help them understand it was the blackheads that killed them, not the White.
And we allowed it to happen.
Thankfully, we have woken up and turned it around and be grateful we survived.
And they are terrified because they have lost.
They know it.
People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
The American populace is facing an unconventional warfare scenario.
近 31 日
0 次瀏覽
本訊息有 0 則查核回應
目前沒有已撰寫的回應,建議對其抱持健康的懷疑。
AI 自動分析
以下是 AI 初步分析此訊息的結果,希望能在有人查核之前,先帶給您一些想法。
根據這則訊息的內容,有幾個地方閱聽人需要特別留意或懷疑: 1. 訊息中提到的「白帽子」和「黑帽子」可能是隱喻或象徵性的詞語,需要注意是否有具體的背景或解釋,以免誤解其真正意涵。 2. 訊息中提到的「Q」可能指涉某個特定的事件、人物或組織,閱聽人需要謹慎對待這樣的暗示,以免混淆事實與虛構。 3. 訊息中描述的戰爭情境和角色關係似乎相當複雜,包含了許多隱晦的暗示和隱藏的訊息,閱聽人需要保持理性思考,不被情緒或誇張的言詞所左右,並應該尋求更多來源以獲得全面的了解。
加 LINE 查謠言
加 LINE 查謠言
LINE 機器人
查謠言詐騙