本篇回應
Ann 認為 含有錯誤訊息
引用自 Ann 查核回應
部份錯誤,部分為個人意見。

1. 此段影片,來自加拿大極右翼媒體Rebel News,於達沃斯論壇「場外」,向輝瑞執行長Albert Bourla的採訪片段。

2. 輝瑞疫苗在上市前,確實並未研究其是否能「阻止病毒傳播」,但並非如記者所言:「疫苗不能阻止傳染」。

(1)疫苗臨床測試的用意,本來就只在於確認預防疾病與重症的功效,而非「阻止傳播」,埃默里大學疫苗中心副主任Walter Orenstein博士表示,「傳播」是複雜的衡量指標,輝瑞在臨床試驗期間沒有研究疫苗對傳播的影響並非特例。

(2)輝瑞自始沒有聲稱病毒能阻止傳播,未如記者宣稱的「保密」。美國FDA於2020年12月11日通過疫苗授權的新聞稿,也明白表示「目前,沒有數據可以確定疫苗將提供多長時間的保護,也沒有證據表明該疫苗可防止SARS-CoV-2在人與人之間傳播。」

(3) 費城兒童醫院疫苗教育中心主任Paul Offit指出:「當你接種疫苗,將明顯降低你被感染的機率,因此也會降低你將其傳播給他人的機會」,雖不能保證消除所有的傳播,但疫苗上市後的研究確實發現,輝瑞疫苗有助於減少alpha和delta變種的傳播。

3. 依照目前的國際監測數據,疫苗能有效降低重症與死亡率,非如記者所言「無效」。
英國國家統計局(ONS)數據及衛生安全局(UKHSA)對疫苗有效性的監測,已顯示接種COVID-19疫苗能降低重症與死亡率。台大公共衛生學院教授陳秀熙亦表示,目前台灣施打完追加劑疫苗與未施打者比較,預防感染效益是5成。

資料佐證

Pfizer CEO’s Davos Appearance Spark Conspiracies And Fake News – Here’s Why
https://www.outlookindia.com/business/pfizer-ceo-s-davos-appearance-spark-conspiracies-and-fake-news-here-s-why--news-255169

【錯誤】網傳影片「有一個壓倒性的共識即疫苗沒有任何作用,不起任何作用,無效...強制疫苗殺死的人比他們拯救的人要多得多...」?
https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/articles/7721

英國衛生安全局(UKHSA):Monitoring reports of the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/monitoring-reports-of-the-effectiveness-of-covid-19-vaccination

politifact: Pfizer executive “admits” vaccine was never tested for preventing transmission.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/oct/13/instagram-posts/alleged-revelation-about-pfizer-vaccine-trial-noth/

無敵星星不完全無敵真的嗎?打過3劑確診又二次感染,2專家揭「症狀嚴重度」有差!
https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183029/post/202206170012/

【錯誤】網傳影片「有一個壓倒性的共識即疫苗沒有任何作用,不起任何作用,無效...強制疫苗殺死的人比他們拯救的人要多得多...」?

【報告將隨時更新 2022/6/21版】 一、網傳影片是社群平台在2022年間發布;影片中出現主講者是加拿大醫師霍奇金森(​​Roger Hodkinson),他曾發表反疫苗的錯誤訊息。 二、學者依據全球數據表示,新冠疫苗可降低重症與死亡風險,並非傳言影片所稱「沒有作用」。 三、專家表示,疫苗接種後死亡可能有很多因素,與疫苗接種為時序相關,但未必有因果關係。施打疫苗後出現的各種症狀、任何影響健康的

https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/articles/7721
此查核回應尚被用於以下的可疑訊息
影片一則 (尚未支援預覽)
Mr. Borla, can I ask you, when did you know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission?
How long did you know that without saying it publicly?
Thank you very much. I'm sorry.
Answer that question. I mean, we now know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission,
but why did you keep it secret? You said it was 100% effective, then 90%, then 80%, then 70%.
But we now know that the vaccines do not stop transmission. Why did you keep that secret?
Have a nice day.
I won't have a nice day until I know the answer.
Why did you keep it a secret that your vaccine did not stop transmission?
Is it time to apologize to the world, sir? To give refunds back to the countries that
poured all their money into your vaccine that doesn't work, your ineffective vaccine?
Are you not ashamed of what you've done in the last couple of years?
Do you have any apologies to the public, sir?
Are you proud of it? You've made millions on the backs of people's entire livelihoods.
How does that feel to walk the streets as a millionaire
on the backs of the regular person at home in Australia, in England, in Canada?
What do you think about on your yacht, sir? What do you think about on your private jet?
Are you worried about product liability? Are you worried about myocarditis?
What about the sudden deaths?
What do you have to say about young men dropping dead of heart attacks
every day? Why won't you answer these basic questions?
No apologies, sir.
Do you think you should be charged criminally for some of the criminal behaviour you've
obviously been a part of?
How much money have you personally made off the vaccine?
How many boosters do you think it'll take for you to be happy enough with your earnings?
Nothing.
Who did you meet with here in secret? Will you disclose who you met with?
Who did you pay commissions to? In the past, Pfizer has paid $2.3 billion in fines for
deceptive marketing. Have you engaged in that same conduct again? Are you under investigation
like you were before for your deceptive marketing, sir?
If any other product in the world doesn't work as promised, you get a refund. Should you not
refund to countries that laid out billions for your ineffective vaccine?
Are you used to only sympathetic media so you don't know how to answer any questions?

以上內容「Cofacts 真的假的」訊息回報機器人與查證協作社群提供,以 CC授權 姓名標示-相同方式分享 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) 釋出,於後續重製或散布時,原社群顯名及每一則查證的出處連結皆必須被完整引用。