本篇回應
woof! 認為 含有個人意見
引用自 woof! 查核回應
該文章部分內容疑似cherry-picking,只拿出論文中支持特定論點的部分資料。

以"燃煤火力發電讓美國每年額外死亡4.3萬人"為例,該論文提到1999至2007年平均每年死亡人數為43000人,總和為39000。但下句就提到2007年後就明顯下降,到2020年只有1600人。

"Annual excess deaths attributable to coal PM2.5 were highest between 1999 and 2007, averaging more than 43,000 deaths per year for a total of 390,000 (95% CI: 360,000 to 430,000). After 2007, annual excess deaths declined substantially, reaching 1600 (95% CI: 1400 to 1700) in 2020."

不同意見出處

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870829/

Mortality risk from United States coal electricity generation

Policy-makers seeking to limit the impact of coal electricity-generating units (EGUs, also known as power plants) on air quality and climate justify regulations by quantifying the health burden attrib

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870829/
此查核回應尚被用於以下的可疑訊息
#住在發電廠附近的居民如果害怕輻射的傷害,那大家更要怕的是燃煤火力發電!

🔥美國研究指出,#燃煤火力發電散播的輻射粉塵是核能電廠的超過一百倍!

🫁用肺發電!核輻射污染更高! (圖片:中火燃煤與核三廠)

💥結論(必看!)
🔥煤炭中含有鈾和釷,它們在自然界中的含量非常微量,但煤炭經過燃燒後,鈾和釷的濃度會高達其原始水平的幾倍。
🔥事實上,#發電廠燃煤發電產生的粉煤飛灰,#其向周圍環境攜帶的輻射量,「#比核電廠產生的輻射量高出100倍。」
😬結論是,#燃煤電廠產生的廢棄物的放射性實際上比核電廠產生的廢棄物更高。因此,馬來西亞需要考慮未來對燃煤電廠常規空氣排放的放射性影響進行研究。

Conclusion
🔥Coal contains Uranium and Thorium and they occur in such trace amounts in natural,but when coal is burned,Uranium and Thorium are concentrated at up to a few times their original levels.
🔥In fact,the fly ash emitted from burning coal for electricity by a power plant,carries into the
surrounding environment,100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy.
😬The conclusion is the waste produced by coal plants is actually more radioactive than that gencrated by nuclear power plant. Thus,Malaysia needs to consider the possible future study of radiological impact from airborne routine discharges of coal-fired power plant.

🇺🇲資料來源美國科技能源部刊登的論文:https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/21557305

🔥2023美國刊登在科學Science期刊上研究「#燃煤火力發電增加死亡」:
🔥#燃煤火力發電所產生的PM2.5更毒,「#致死亡風險是一般空氣污染的PM2.5的2.1倍!」
🔥燃煤火力發電讓美國每年額外死亡4.3萬人,過去20年美國46萬人因燃煤發電死亡
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adf4915
1 other reply

以上內容「Cofacts 真的假的」訊息回報機器人與查證協作社群提供,以 CC授權 姓名標示-相同方式分享 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) 釋出,於後續重製或散布時,原社群顯名及每一則查證的出處連結皆必須被完整引用。