主席,您說了許多關於中國的美妙說話,
也肯定說了許多正確的說話。
但是,您如何平衡說,
為了讓中國成功,
它似乎是基於高層的壓迫,
環境破壞,
監控,
某種意識形態的固執?
我們談到香港和維吾爾族,
您如何平衡這一點?
您認為這是可忍受的嗎?
謝謝,
我很高興你問了這個問題,
因為你的問題非常吸引了
亞洲媒體對中國的看法,
我會直接向您建議,
這是一個錯誤的現實觀點。
我們先說您所用的第一句話,
壓迫。
如果中國共產黨
只依賴壓迫
保持權力,
它不會創造世界上最積極的經濟,
對吧?
它是世界上最積極的經濟,
它為30年來
提供了最快的增長經濟,
並且通過教育中國人民
到一個程度
中國人民從來沒有被教育過。
您說這是壓迫,
您顯然是採取舊式的冷戰思維。
我在1976年在莫斯科,
我看到了莫斯科的壓迫。
當我在莫斯科時,
蘇聯民眾不得不離開蘇聯,
這是壓迫。
2019年,
139億中國人
自由離開了中國。
猜猜,
139億中國人,
對嗎?
那是英國的兩倍人口,
回到中國。
所以您的所有描述,
當您說環境污染,
中國的氣候變化政策
比美國的更為負責任,
中國的氣候變化政策
比美國的氣候變化政策
And you know what?
The reason why we are having climate change today
is not because of new flows of greenhouse gas emissions
from China and India
It's because of what the western countries
have put in the atmosphere
since the western industrial revolution
Get the data
The single largest contributor
cumulatively, right?
Is number one, United States
Number two, Europe
Number three, China
Right?
And the west wants China to pay
an economic price for the current flows
But the west doesn't want to pay
an economic price
for what it put in the atmosphere
You want to deprive the Indians of electricity
When the United States could just by the way
If the United States could impose
a dollar a gallon tax
That would save the world
Cut down gasoline consumption
Raise money for investment in green technology
Simple solutions
And by contrast
The largest reforestation program in the world
Is carried out by China
It has already reforested an area
The size of Belgium or bigger, right?
So all your descriptions
Capture the natural distortions of China
That you get in the Anglo-Saxon media
Which violate the rules of the enlightenment
Which say that you must be rational, calm and objective
Especially in understanding your adversary