登入以檢視影片內容

逐字稿

We have 1400 studies, peer-reviewed studies published on NIH's website, PubMed, linking it to all of linking various vaccines to all of those injuries. doing this for money? Well, they're making $60 billion a year selling us vaccines, but they're making $500 billion a year sell the remedies for the injuries caused by vaccines. The diabetes medication, the Adderall, the Ritalin, the Concerta, the Advair inhalers, the albuterol inhalers, the antiseizure medications, all of those. This is a really great business plan for these companies. You make people sick, and then you sell them the lifetime cure. Measles, they weren't making any money. If you get measles or chickenpox, the cure is chicken soup and vitamin A. And you can't patent either of those — and you're well in a week. They're self-limiting illnesses that go away in a week. But if you can give somebody that vaccine and make them diabetic for life, then you've got a permanent customer. Or ADD or ADHD. And many of the vaccines are for illnesses for which there's zero risk. A baby, a one-day old baby has zero risk of getting hepatitis B if his mother doesn't have it, which every mother is tested for. You can only get it from unprotected sex or from sharing needles. Why are we giving one-day-old babies a vaccine for hepatitis B? And they admit the vaccine only lasts five years. That baby is not going to have sex with a prostitute in the first five years of life. There's zero risk. And yet it's a very, very dangerous vaccine.
近 31 日
0 次瀏覽
本訊息有 0 則查核回應
目前沒有已撰寫的回應,建議對其抱持健康的懷疑。
AI 自動分析
以下是 AI 初步分析此訊息的結果,希望能在有人查核之前,先帶給您一些想法。
這則訊息中提到了許多關於疫苗的資訊,但有幾個地方需要特別注意: 1. 資料來源:訊息提到有1400篇研究刊載在NIH的網站PubMed上,但沒有提供具體引用或連結。閱聽人應該要求確切的資料來源,以確保資訊的可信度。 2. 資訊真實性:訊息中提到疫苗可能導致各種傷害,並聲稱製藥公司為了獲利而推動疫苗接種。這些言論缺乏科學證據支持,閱聽人應該保持懷疑態度,並查證相關資訊。 3. 醫療建議:訊息中對於疫苗接種的必要性提出質疑,並指出一些疾病對於特定人群的風險很低。然而,專業醫療機構通常會根據科學證據和公共衛生需求來制定疫苗接種計畫,閱聽人應該尋求醫學專家的意見。 總之,閱聽人應該保持對於疫苗相關資訊的理性思考,並從可靠來源獲取資訊,以做出明智的決定。
加 LINE 查謠言
加 LINE 查謠言
LINE 機器人
查謠言詐騙