登入以檢視影片內容

逐字稿

Generally in American history, when we intervene in another country, whether true or not, we come up with a high-minded pretense. Liberating a people, spreading democracy, introducing baseball to the Japanese. On what moral foundation will this conflict be framed? We're going to have presidents in Venezuela as it pertains to oil. We're going to get the oil flowing the way it should be. Seems a little on the nose. Um. Oil, precious commodity, certainly, uh but not the reason a country formed 250 years ago on the ideas of liberty and self-determination would go into a country and snatch a man at night. There must be a slightly more noble pretense. We're going to be taking out a tremendous amount of wealth out of the ground. We need total access. We need access to the oil. Sir, again, let let let let let I I see what we're going here. Do you mind just reframing that? I'm not quite clear on the high-minded principle behind this. In other words, we'll be selling oil. Senator Lindsey Graham, you're an old hand at warmongering. You've done this a bunch. You're on the plane. Can you help this dude out? There's going to be Americans alive today because they shut down a narco-terrorist state called Venezuela. This is a good thing, not a bad thing. And the oil companies are going to go in and rebuild this system. God damn it! What? We can't even be conspiracy theorists now. I think they did it for the oil. Yeah, no, I did it for the oil.
近 31 日
0 次瀏覽
本訊息有 0 則查核回應
目前沒有已撰寫的回應,建議對其抱持健康的懷疑。
加 LINE 查謠言
加 LINE 查謠言
LINE 機器人
查謠言詐騙